食人之旅

文化旅游学的，能真切的感受到游客的文化自我中心主义和食人族融入现代社会的困难

发人深省。西方游客视角下的**“原始”人，过着“不够文明开化”的生活。**人则一方面不满于西方游客讲价（因为他们去西方人开的商店不能讲价）、所有的东西都想带走（包括宗教性物品），另一方面又需要游客花钱。看得挺难受的

其实是探讨了旅游凝视和遗产旅游中的话语问题 具体可以见After Cannibal Tours: Cargoism and Marginality in a Post-touristic Sepik River Society一文 不过文章的视角更上一层了

很有趣地记录了游客、原住民和纪录片本身的关系。然而在镜头之外，保留地将因为纪录片本身的诞生，而受到了现**明更强烈的冲击，从而进一步改变影片中记录着的世界。

Biu! *到了人类学的痛处：colonialism—ethnography—trourism都是一回事...

very poetic, very observational, money disparity is a big problem, tourists want locals to remain primitive but thinks that they have to **** civilize them, the german tourist talks about colonialism (the germans were popular!), phototaking, the lady posing with naked boys...

Tourists reveal ethnocentrism. To see how natives' traditional value and lifestyle are shaped by ecotourism. Natives commodify their daily life, sacred culture in return of meaningless money. They bear the heaviest cost of change -- cultural exploitation

文明与原始，运用多重视角（导演的、部落者的、旅行者的）描述眼中的“他者”。以为是讲述原始部落，实则讲述旅游者的故事。很有讽刺意味。"There is nothing so strange in a strange land, as the stranger who comes to visit it."

二十多年前的片子 不知道现在的**人对外来者的看法是否还是一样 如果是 我不想去拜访 外来者是有错 把一些自然神圣的都破坏了 但不能因为外国人有钱就去expect他们在你们那里花钱 否则就充满愤怒

O'Rourke's music and montage enlarge the ethnographic representative moment. The fine boundaries among time periods and countries are blurred and appear meaningless in the Other's eyes.